Williams v. United States Steel Corporation et al
| Patrice M Williams |
| United States Steel Corporation and Lucas McElfresh |
| 2:2012cv00402 |
| October 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| Lake |
| Paul R Cherry |
| Joseph S Van Bokkelen |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
OPINION AND ORDER On all claims in the Amended Complaint the Court ORDERS JUDGMENT in favor of Defendant United States Steel Corporation against Plaintiff Patrice Williams. She shall take nothing by her Amended Complaint.The Clerk of this Court shal l ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 8/28/14. cc: Plaintiff Patrice Williams, pro se, M. Cristina Sharp and Terence M. Austgen, Attorneys for Defendant United States Steel Corporation(kjp)
|
|
Filing
51
OPINION AND ORDER: Court DENIES 23 Motion to Cease and Desist Denial of Regularly Scheduled Off Days and Vacation Days and 32 Motion for a Temporary "Real" Sabbath Accommodation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 9/20/2013. cc: Williams (tc)
|
|
Filing
30
OPINION AND ORDER granting 18 Motion to Dismiss as to Defendant Lucas McElfresh only. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 3/13/13. cc: Williams (mc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
