Ashley v. Mollenhauer et al
| John D Ashley |
| Municipal Bd of LaPorte Co, Michael Mollenhauer, Scott Bell and Steve Vance |
| 2:2012cv00468 |
| November 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| LaPorte |
| Paul R Cherry |
| Rudy Lozano |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
OPINION AND ORDER granting 49 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and directs the Clerk to close this case and enter Judgment in favor of the Defendants and against the plaintiff John D Ashley. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 4/24/2014. (cc: Ashley) (rmn)
|
|
Filing
40
OPINION AND ORDER denying 39 the request contained with Plaintiff's Injunctive and Declaratory Relief Claims. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 9/3/2013. (cc: Ashley) (rmn)
|
|
Filing
8
OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTS the Plaintiff leave to proceed against DefendantsMollenhauer and Bell for damages; DISMISSES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, all other claims, and DISMISSES Defendants Steve Vance and the MunicipalBoard of LaPorte Count y: ORDERS that Defendants Mollenhauer and Bell respond to the complaint; DIRECTS the Marshals Service to effect service of process on Defendants Mollenhauer and Bell on the Plaintiffs behalf. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 1/31/2013. (cc: Ashley and RDC Plainfield)(rmn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
