Turner v. Menard Inc

Plaintiff: Gail Turner
Defendant: Menard Inc
Case Number: 2:2012cv00490
Filed: November 21, 2012
Court: Indiana Northern District Court
Office: Hammond Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Rudy Lozano
Referring Judge: Andrew P Rodovich
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 31, 2016 46 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 33 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendant Menard Inc. Because no claims remain pending, this case is DISMISSED. Clerk DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Defendant Menard Inc and against Plaintiff Gail Turner. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 3/31/16. (cer)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Turner v. Menard Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gail Turner
Represented By: David A Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Menard Inc
Represented By: Bruce Phillip Clark
Represented By: Court L Farrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?