Townsend v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
| Catherine A Townsend |
| Commissioner of the Social Security Administration |
| SSA (Court Use Only) |
| 2:2012cv00516 |
| December 12, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| Lake |
| Paul R Cherry |
| William C Lee |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES without prejudice in part Plaintiff's Motion for Approval of Attorneys Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C.A. Section 406(b) 37 and AWARDS Plaintiff's counsel a total of $9,943.23 in a ttorney fees pursuant to §206(b)(1) of the Social Security Act. The Court further ORDERS that payment by the Commissioner in the amount of $9,943.23 be made directly to counsel Barry A. Schultz in accordance with the fee agreement signed by Plaintiff. Upon receipt of the fee, counsel is ORDERED to refund to Plaintiff the smaller of the fee awards received, that is, $9,943.23. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 11/15/2017. (lhc)
|
|
Filing
25
OPINION AND ORDER: Court REVERSES the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, and REMANDS this matter for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion and Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 6/9/2014. (tc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
