Grimes v. Gary Community School Corporation et al
| Dara M Grimes |
| Gary Community School Corporation, Gary City of, D Goshay and A Bradshaw |
| 2:2013cv00036 |
| January 22, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| Lake |
| Andrew P Rodovich |
| Philip P Simon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
116
OPINION AND ORDER: DENIES Gary Community School Corporation and the Officers Motion to Strike as to the affidavit of Regina Hunter and DENIES AS MOOT theremainder of the Motion to Strike [DE 100]; DENIES Grimes Motion for Leave to File Sur-Response to Defendants Gary Community School Corporation, D. Goshay and A. Bradshaws Reply to Plaintiffs Response to School Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 102]; GRANTS the City of Garys Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 94]; and GRANTS IN PART, AND DENIES IN PART Gary Community SchoolCorporation, Officer D. Goshay, and Officer A. Bradshaws Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 91]. The Court GRANTS summary judgment in favor of all Defendants on the First Amendment claim and Gary Community School Corporation on all other claims. The Court DENIES summary judgment as to the false arrest and excessive force claims against Officers Goshay and Bradshaw. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 3/23/2016. (rmn)
|
|
Filing
90
OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTING 85 MOTION for Reconsideration by Defendant Gary City of. The grant of default is VACATED. All of the previously-set deadlines remain unchanged, and apply to Gary as they apply to the other defendants. DE 84 is STRICKEN from the record as redundant and filed in error. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 8/19/2015. (lhc)
|
|
Filing
82
OPINION AND ORDER: Court ADOPTS the Recommendation that default be entered against Defendant City of Gary, thereby GRANTING IN PART the motion for sanctions. Court ADOPTS IN PART 60 Report and Recommendation, GRANTS IN PART 45 Verified Motio n for Sanctions. Court GRANTS 80 Motion to Quash. Parties to complete Grimes's deposition within 30 days of the entry of this Order. Due to the fact that discovery closed months ago, no further discovery other than Grimes's deposition will be permitted. In person status hearing SET for 7/23/2015 10:00 AM in US District Court - Hammond before Chief Judge Philip P Simon. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 6/16/2015. (tc)
|
|
Filing
48
OPINION AND ORDER granting 44 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery filed by Dara M Grimes and denying 43 MOTION to Compel Discovery Responses filed by Dara M Grimes. Discovery deadline is extended to and including 11/28/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 9/5/14. (kjp)
|
|
Filing
42
OPINION AND ORDER granting 36 Motion to Compel Discovery Response From Defendant City of Gary and DIRECTING the City of Gary to provide a response within 14 days; denying AS MOOT 34 Motion to Compel; striking 35 Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 7/18/14. (mc)
|
|
Filing
41
OPINION AND ORDER granting 27 Motion to Set Aside Default against defendants A. Bradshaw and D. Goshay. Because the Plaintiffs Motion for Order Denying Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default by Clerk DE 31 is redundant, the 32 motion to strike it is GRANTED and the Court STRIKES DE 31 Motion. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 5/7/14. (mc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
