Arama v. Winfield et al
| Bryant Winfield and PB Industries Inc |
| John Arama |
| 2:2013cv00381 |
| October 21, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| Porter |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| John E Martin |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
OPINION AND ORDER: The Plaintiff's motion to exclude the conclusions of Stanley Sangdahl (DE 40) is GRANTED insofar as conclusions numbered 2-5 are excluded; the Plaintiff's motion to exclude the conclusions of Jack Auflick (DE 41) is GRAN TED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, resulting in the exclusion of conclusions numbered 1-2 and 4-5; and Defendant's motion to exclude the testimony of Kevin Rider and Anita Kerezman (DE 45) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as detailed herein. The parties are DIRECTED to read the entirety of the Order given the detailed rulings limiting the testimony of each expert witness. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 5/11/17. (ksp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
