Sparks v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
| John Sparks |
| Norfolk Southern Railway Company |
| 2:2014cv00040 |
| February 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Paul R Cherry |
| James T Moody |
| Federal Employers Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
148
OPINION AND ORDER: Court GRANTS 132 Motion for New Trial on Mutual Mistake of Fact and Damages and Memorandum in Support. The court sets this matter for a Jury Trial on 12/11/2018 at 9:00 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 11/8/2018. (tc)
|
|
Filing
54
OPINION AND ORDER The court GRANTS the trustee 60 days to ratify, join, or be substituted as a party. If the trustee declines to take any action with respect to the subject claims within 60 days of this order, the claims will be dismissed with preju dice. If the trustee ratifies, joins, or is substituted into this action, then the court will rule on the remaining substantive arguments made in defendants motion for summary judgment. Defendants 42 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, in part. The Clerk is ordered to TERMINATE defendants motion for summary judgment and related 36 motion to strike, for statistical purposes, as the remaining issues will be held in abeyance. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 9/27/16. (kjp)
|
|
Filing
35
OPINION AND ORDER re 34 STATEMENT per Judge's 10/5/15 Order filed by John Sparks. The Court DECLINES to award fees in this instance. Plaintiff John Sparks and Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company shall each bear their own expenses incurred in making or defending the Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 11/9/2015. (lhc)
|
|
Filing
33
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court hereby DENIES Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company to Respond to Plaintiffs Request for Production 26 , and ORDERS that Defendant need not produce documents 4-7, 9, 13, 14, 17-19, and 2 1-23 in its privilege log in response to Numbers 28 and 29 of Plaintiffs Request for Production of Documents, served June 14, 2014. Further, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5)(B), the Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff, by October 19, 20 15, to FILE a statement explaining why the Motion was substantially justified or why it would be unjust for the Court to order him to pay Defendants reasonable expenses, including attorneys fees, incurred in opposing the Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 10/5/2015. (rmn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sparks v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Sparks | |
| Represented By: | Steven L Groves PHV |
| Represented By: | Philip E Proud PHV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
