Scott v. Lear Corporation et al
David A Scott, Jr |
Lear Corporation, Darrell Harper, Larry Payne, Jr, Barbara Sacha and Ryan Bruckner |
2:2014cv00107 |
April 4, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Hammond Office |
Lake |
Rudy Lozano |
Andrew P Rodovich |
Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 110 OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the Opinion and Order, Lear's Summary Judgment motion 99 is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 9/27/2017. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(jss) |
Filing 105 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 98 Motion for Subpoena of Defendants Incoming and Outgoing Phone Records by Plaintiff David A Scott, Jr. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 2/7/2017. (cc: Plaintiff) (jss) |
Filing 44 OPINION AND ORDER denying 38 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 3/9/15. cc: Scott (mc) |
Filing 33 OPINION AND ORDER: Court DENIES 16 Lear Corporation's Partial Motion to Dismiss; GRANTS 19 Individual Defendants Motion to Dismiss. The Individual Defendants Larry Payne, Barbara Sacha, Ryan Brueckner and Darrel Harper are DISMISSED from this lawsuit. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 11/4/2014. cc: David A Scott, Jr (tc) |
Filing 23 OPINION AN ORDER denying 5 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 8/13/14. cc: Scott (mc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.