Hu v. Amtrak U.S.A et al
| Yaodi Hu |
| Amtrak U.S.A, Lake County IN, Whiting IN City of, Hammond IN City of, Caesars Entertainment Inc, Indiana State of, Horseshoe Casino, Norfolk Southern Railroad and CSX Corporation |
| Yanqiong Yao |
| 2:2014cv00129 |
| April 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Paul R Cherry |
| William C Lee |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTING 98 Joint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution by Defendants Amtrak U.S.A, Hammond IN City of, Lake County IN; DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment against the Plaintiff and in favor of the Defendants. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 9/30/2015. (lhc)(cc: Pla)
|
|
Filing
81
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 77 Motion to Dismiss , Party Whiting IN City of terminated. Attorney Sheri Bradtke McNeil terminated; DENYING re 78 Motion To Join. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 9/26/14. (eml)
|
|
Filing
75
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 64 Motion for More Definite Statement. Plaintiff has up to and including 7/7/2014 to file a Second Amended Complaint in compliance with thisOpinion and Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 6/18/14. cc: Hu (mc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
