Skarzynski v. Holder et al
| Aleksander Skarzynski |
| Eric H Holder, Jr, David A Capp and Kathleen Sebelius |
| 2:2014cv00172 |
| May 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| Porter |
| Paul R Cherry |
| Rudy Lozano |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
OPINION AND ORDER: Court DENIES 32 Motion to Add Claims and GRANTS 14 Motion to Dismiss. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 1/12/2015. cc: pro se pltf (tc)
|
|
Filing
39
OPINION AND ORDER granting 20 Motion to Quash Subpoenas and orders that the subpoenas served by Plaintiff be QUASHED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 12/2/14. cc: Skarzynski (mc)
|
|
Filing
12
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 10 Motion to Redact Additional Information. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff until September 19, 2014, to file the redacted versions of the exhibits. The Court DENIES 11 Motion to Withdra w Supeona [sic] and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to keep this motion under seal. The Court further DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to keep the Exhibits to Plaintiffs Complaint under seal until he files redacted versions. After he files redacted versions, the Clerk of Court is directed to include the original, unredacted exhibits as sealed attachments to the redacted version of the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 9/11/14. cc: Skarzynsky (mc)
|
|
Filing
8
OPINION AND ORDER: Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART 4 Motion to Seal. Plaintiff to REFILE his complaint by 8/11/2014, with his son's identifying information redacted as provided for in FRCP 5.2. No other changes may be made. Plainti ff to refrain from naming his son in all future court filings. Court DENIES the motion insofar as it seeks to have this case sealed to protect Plaintiff from retaliation by his former employer. Clerk of Court DIRECTED to keep the Complaint under se al until Plaintiff files a redacted copy. After the redacted Complaint is filed, the Clerk shall replace the original Complaint with the redacted copy. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to include the original, unredacted Complaint as a seale d attachment to the redacted version. Clerk of Court also DIRECTED to keep the 4 Motion to Seal under seal, since it contains the minor's full name. The remainder of this case is ORDERED UNSEALED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 7/29/2014. cc: Skarzynski, AUSA (tc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
