H.E.D. Inc v. Konica Minolta Business Solutions U.S.A. Inc. et al
H.E.D. Inc |
Konica Minolta Business Solutions U.S.A. Inc, Konica Minolta Premier Finance, William Kochanny and General Electric Capital Corporation |
2:2014cv00311 |
September 3, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Hammond Office |
Lake |
John E Martin |
James T Moody |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 119 OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the Opinion and Order, H.E.D.'s motion for summary judgment 82 is DENIED; defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment 89 is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED in part, and the three evidentia ry motions 91 , 106 , 108 are DENIED as moot. The parties are ORDERED to file a joint status report regarding their willingness to engage in a settlement conference before a Magistrate Judge by 10/13/2017. A trial date will be set under separate order. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 9/29/2017. (jss) |
Filing 98 OPINION AND ORDER: The Court hereby GRANTS the Defendants 88 Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply. For the reasons set forth in the Opinion and Order, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's 74 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 4/6/2017. (jss) |
Filing 62 ORDER and OPINION denying 22 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 9/26/2016. (nal) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.