Restricted Filer v. Pact-Bradley House/Center et al
Addones Spencer |
Charles E Samuals, Regina Ruddell, Regional Re-entry Manager and Pact-Bradley House/Center |
2:2014cv00418 |
November 14, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Hammond Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Paul R Cherry |
Philip P Simon |
Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE: plaintiff Addones Spencer, BOP # 11060-027 is ORDERED to pay (and the facility having custody of him to automatically remit) to the clerk of this court 20 % of the money he receives for e ach calendar month during which he receives $10.00 or more, until the $400.00 filing fee is paid in full; DIRECTING the clerk of court to return, unfiled, any papers filed in any civil case by or on behalf of Addones Spencer (except for a notice of appeal in this case or habeas corpus proceeding) until he has paid in full all outstanding fees in all civil actions in any federal court; DIRECTING the clerk to note on the docket of this case any attempted filings in violation o f this order; and DIRECTING the clerk to mail a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 12/8/14. cc: Spencer, MCC Inmate Trust Fund(mc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.