Babjak v. Arcelormittal USA Inc et al
Plaintiff: Ryan Babjak and Denise Babjak
Defendant: KT-Grant, Inc., ArcelorMittal USA, Inc., ArcelorMittal USA, LLC and ArcelorMittal Indiana Harbor, LLC
Case Number: 2:2015cv00040
Filed: February 3, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Hammond Office
County: Porter
Presiding Judge: John E Martin
Presiding Judge: Rudy Lozano
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER: The Court has nothing to add or take away and fully adopts Judge Cherry's recommendations as its own. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's 71 Motion for Default Judgment; DECLINES to award reasonable expenses under Federal R ule of Civil Procedure 37(b)(2)(C); SETS the deadline for Rule 30(b)(6) depositions for 30 days after today's date; ORDERS Plaintiffs to file, within 7 days after the Rule 30(b)(6) depositions, either a motion to reopen discovery or a status rep ort; GRANTS ArcelorMittal's 75 motion for leave to file Rule 56 summary judgment motions except that, no such motion may be filed until the Court holds a dispositive motions and trial scheduling conference. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 8/14/2017. (jss)
August 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 63 OPINION AND ORDER The Court AWARDS Plaintiffs reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred in making the Motion to Compel. The Court ORDERS Plaintiffs attorney to file an affidavit detailing the costs and fees incurred in litigating the motion by Sep tember 2, 2016. Defendants may file an objection(as to the amount of reasonable expenses only) by September 16, 2016, and, if an objection is filed, Plaintiffs may file a response no later than September 30, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 8/24/16. (kjp)
August 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 60 OPINION AND ORDER The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel DE 42 and ORDERS Defendants to designate an appropriate person or persons to testify on their behalf and to provide a date on which the deposition(s) can take place. Defendants mus t do so by August 15, 2016. The Court DENIES as moot Plaintiffs Emergency Motion to Compel DE 43 . Any objection to the award of attorney fees incurred by Plaintiffs in the litigation of this motion must be filed by August 23, 2016. Any response by Plaintiffs must be filed by September 6, 2016. If a response is filed, a reply may be filed no later than September 13, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 8/9/16. (kjp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Babjak v. Arcelormittal USA Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ryan Babjak
Represented By: Kenneth J Allen
Represented By: Cornelius J Harrington, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Denise Babjak
Represented By: Kenneth J Allen
Represented By: Cornelius J Harrington, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KT-Grant, Inc.
Represented By: Caren L Pollack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ArcelorMittal USA, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew S Ver Steeg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ArcelorMittal USA, LLC
Represented By: Matthew S Ver Steeg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ArcelorMittal Indiana Harbor, LLC
Represented By: Matthew S Ver Steeg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?