DirectBuy, Inc. v. Buy Direct, LLC et al
| DirectBuy, Inc. |
| Buy Direct, LLC, Tom Pope and Elona Pope |
| 2:2015cv00344 |
| September 8, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| Lake |
| Paul R Cherry |
| Joseph S Van Bokkelen |
| Franchise |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court STRIKES the claims in the Second Amended Counterclaim 100 against Michael Bornhorst. Counterplaintiffs' Motion For Leave To File Third Amended Counterclaim 108 is GRANTED IN PART: Counterplaintiffs are DIREC TED to file a revised version of the proposed Third Amended Counterclaim [DE 108-1], which omits any claim(s) against Michael Bornhorst. Counterplaintiffs shall file the revised Third Amended Counterclaim on or before 01/23/2023. The Court EXTENDS the deadline by which Counterplaintiffs must serve the New DirectBuy Entities to 02/20/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 01/10/2023. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (jdb)
|
|
Filing
99
OPINION AND ORDER: The Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Counterclaim DE 90 is GRANTED. Defendants shall file their Second Amended Counterclaim on or before 4/4/22 and are further DIRECTED to take immediate steps to comply with the requirem ents of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 for serving any new parties named in the Second Amended Counterclaim. NOTICE is given that the Verified Complaint DE 1 will be dismissed without prejudice if an appearance by counsel is not entered on behalf of Plaintiff DirectBuy, Inc. on or before 3/31/22. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 3/8/22. (Copy mailed to DirectBuy, Inc). (nal)
|
|
Filing
58
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court DENIES Nonparty Dylan Astles Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena DE 48 . The Court ORDERS Dylan Astle to appear for a deposition at a time and date agreed upon by Astle and Defendants. The Court notes that Defendants represented they would make reasonable accommodations for Astles schedule, and the Court expects them to do so. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 8/22/2019. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (rmf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
