Carson v. American Quality Schools Corporation Thea Bowman Leadership Academy The et al
American Quality Schools Corporation Thea Bowman Leadership Academy The and United of Omaha Life Insurance Co |
Shawn Carson |
2:2015cv00348 |
September 9, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Hammond Office |
Lake |
Paul R Cherry |
Philip P Simon |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 50 OPINION AND ORDER: Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART 35 American Quality Schools Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment as outlined. Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART 33 United of Omaha's Motion for Summary Judgment as outlined. A Status and Scheduling Conference is SET for 5/23/2017 02:00 PM in US District Court - Hammond before Judge Philip P Simon. Counsel to appear in person. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 5/17/2017. (tc) |
Filing 19 ORDER AND OPINION: Court DENIES Omaha's request to dismiss the complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) re 3 Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Jury Demand. Instead, the Court will construe the complaint has presenting claims arising under ERISA. Court GRANTS Omaha's request that Carson's jury demand be stricken. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 4/28/2016. (tc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.