Lozanovski v City of Crown Point et al
Craig A Lozanovski |
City of Crown Point, Indiana, Scott Bourrell, Derrell Josleyn, Robert Ballas and Mille Knezevic |
2:2015cv00454 |
December 16, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Hammond Office |
Lake |
Paul R Cherry |
Theresa L Springmann |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 OPINION AND ORDER: DENYING 38 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Defendants Robert Ballas, Scott Bourrell, Derrell Josleyn, Mille Knezevic. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 2/15/2018. (lhc) |
Filing 54 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 40 MOTION for Leave to File Service of Process filed by Craig A Lozanovski. The Court NOTES that Affidavits of Special Process Server indicating individual service on Defendants have been filed at docket entries 51-1, 51-2, 51-3, and 52-1. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 2/1/18. (mlc) |
Filing 33 OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated in the Order, the 26 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court GRANTS the Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) the claims against Defendant City of Crown Point, Indiana. T he Court ORDERS the Plaintiff to perfect service upon the Defendant Officers by 2/23/2017. If service is not perfected by 2/23/2017, this action will be dismissed without prejudice against the unserved Defendant Officers. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 1/24/2017. (jss) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.