Archer v. T&J Express, Inc. et al
| Danielle L Archer |
| T&J Express, Inc. and James D Raysser |
| 2:2016cv00106 |
| March 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| Porter |
| John E Martin |
| Rudy Lozano |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the Opinion and Order, the Court hereby GRANTS in part, but for relief different than requested, and DENIES in part the Motion to Compel Discovery Responses 27 , and GRANTS, for relief different than requested, Defendant's Motion for Protective Order 32 . The deadline for completion of all the remaining discovery as described in the Opinion and Order is extended through 5/7/2018. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to FILE, on or before 4/18/2018, an itemization of her costs and fees, including attorney's fees, incurred in the Motion to Compel, with Defendants to FILE responses to the requests on or before 5/2/2018, and Plaintiff to reply on or before 5/9/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 4/4/2018. (jss)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
