Gutierrez v. City of East Chicago et al
Plaintiff: Mary Gutierrez
Defendant: City of East Chicago and Housing Authority of the City of East Chicago
Case Number: 2:2016cv00111
Filed: March 31, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Hammond Office
County: Lake
Presiding Judge: Paul R Cherry
Presiding Judge: Joseph S Van Bokkelen
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 148 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 147 and incorporating the Report and Recommendation into this Order. Judgment ENTERED as outlined in the Consent Decree. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 12/2/2020. (lhc)
January 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 115 OPINION AND ORDER The Court ADOPTS the 106 Report and Recommendation, OVERRULES Defendant's 107 Objections to Findings and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge, 84 GRANTS the Verified Petition to Hold Defendant East Chicago Housing Authori ty in Civil Contempt of Court, and GRANTS the 100 Verified Petition to Hold Defendant East Chicago Housing Authority in Civil Contempt of Court. The Court HOLDS Defendant East Chicago Housing Authority in civil contempt of court for its violation o f the 54 Preliminary Injunction Order through the use of the Blanket Consent Form and further HOLDS Defendant East Chicago Housing Authority in civil contempt of court for its violation of the same order when it entered Ms. Bradshaw's apartment for an inspection in her absence without consent, a warrant, or exigent circumstances on November 7, 2017. The Court ORDERS Defendant East Chicago Housing Authority to cease and desist from using the Blanket Consent Form attached as Exhibit A to the Blanket Consent Form Petition at any of its buildings. The Court AWARDS Ms. Bradshaw $100 in damages as a compensatory sanction. The Court further AWARDS Mr. Polk and Ms. Bradshaw their reasonable costs and attorney fees incurred in bringing th ese matters to the Courts attention. The Court ORDERS Polk's and Bradshaw's counsel to file an affidavit detailing these costs and fees by February 10, 2020. The Court REFERS this case to Magistrate Judge Andrew P. Rodovich to hold a settle ment conference. After that settlement conference occurs, the Court will, if necessary, set deadlines related to determining the appropriate remedy regarding the Blanket Consent Form contempt finding. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 1/21/20. cc: Judge Rodovich's chambers (kjp)
April 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 99 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 85 MOTION to Intervene as Class Representative in order to Seek Contempt Remedies against the East Chicago Housing Authority filed by Edith K Bradshaw. The Court ORDERS Intervenor Edith Bradshaw to FILE her Verified Petition for Contempt and exhibits on or before 4/27/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 4/20/18. (ksp)
March 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 63 OPINION AND ORDER: The Court hereby GRANTS 59 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery but DENIES Plaintiff's request for attorney's fees made therein. Should ECHA request a Protective Order as to this discovery, the Court ORDERS the parties to FILE on or before 3/16/2017, a Joint Motion for Agreed Protective Order (with the proposed Agreed Protective Order attached as an exhibit. The Court further ORDERS Defendant Housing Authority of the City of East Chicago to server a complete response to Plaintiff's First Interrogatory on of before 3/30/2017, but after the Agreed Protective Order is entered, if any. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 3/2/2017. (jss)
October 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER ADOPTING 51 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 5 MOTION to Certify Class filed by Mary Gutierrez; GRANTING 5 MOTION to Certify Class by Plaintiff Mary Gutierrez; and GRANTING 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Mary Gutierrez, as outlined in Order. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 10/5/2016. (lhc)
September 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER GRANTS 43 MOTION to Intervene and to Join Pending Motion for Class Certification by Movant Shawn Polk and ORDERS Intervenor Sean Polk to FILE his Complaint on or before 9/21/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 9/14/2016. (lhc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gutierrez v. City of East Chicago et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of East Chicago
Represented By: Michael E Tolbert
Represented By: Shelice R Tolbert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Housing Authority of the City of East Chicago
Represented By: Jewell Harris, Jr
Represented By: Nicholas A Snow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Gutierrez
Represented By: Kenneth J Falk
Represented By: Jan P Kubicki-Mensz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?