Poulard v. Trustees of Indiana University The et al
| Jean Poulard |
| Trustees of Indiana University The, William J Lowe, Mark McPhail, Ida Gillis and Gianluca di Muzio |
| 2:2016cv00115 |
| April 6, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| LaPorte |
| John E Martin |
| Philip P Simon |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's remaining state-law claim. Plaintiff's remaining claim is REMANDED back to state court. The Clerk is directed to return the case to the state court from which it originated. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 11/5/2018. (cc: Lake County Court) (lhc)
|
|
Filing
64
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court DENIES plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment DE 29 , DENIES in part defendants' motion for summary judgment DE 32 as to the breach of contract claim, otherwise GRANTS in part DE 32 defendan ts' motion for summary judgment on all other claims, DENIES plaintiff's motions to strike DE 38 , 42 and 54 and ORDERS the parties to file a joint status report regarding their willingness to engage in a settlement conference before a Magistrate Judge by 10/26/18. A trial date will be set under a separate order. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 9/28/18. (nal)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
