Markel Insurance Company v. United Emergency Medical Services, LLC. et al
| Markel Insurance Company |
| United Emergency Medical Services, LLC., Abraham A Nadermohammadi and Lillian Marlene Rau |
| 2:2016cv00220 |
| June 9, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Paul R Cherry |
| Joseph S Van Bokkelen |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
176
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING the Estate of Stofko's 168 MOTION to Set Aside Dismissal Order and DENYING as moot the Estate of Stofko's 169 MOTION to Substitute Party. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 2/3/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(asd)
|
|
Filing
137
OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment ECF 94 is GRANTED, Rau's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment ECF 114 is DENIED, United Emergency Medical Services, LLC's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment ECF 116 is DENIED and Third Party Defendant Insurance Service Center, Inc's Motion for Summary Judgment Against Third Party Plaintiff United Emergency Medical Services, LLC ECF 122 is DENIED. Rau's Motion to Take Judicial Notice of Computer Scien ce Facts ECF 115 and ISC's Request for Oral Argument ECF 129 are DENIED AS MOOT. By separate order, the Court will set a telephone scheduling conference concerning the Third-Party Complaint. The Court directs the entry of final declarat ory judgment as follows, MARKEL has no duty under the Policy to defend UNITED against the Rau Suit, MARKEL has no duty under the Policy to defend NADERMOHAMMADI against the Rau Suit, MARKEL has no duty under the Policy to indemnify UNITED with respect to the Rau Suit and MARKEL has no duty under the Policy to indemnify NADERMOHAMMADI with respect to the Rau Suit. Signed by Judge Holly A Brady on 6/27/19. (nal)
|
|
Filing
119
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court DENIES without prejudice Rau's Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document Re Markel Summary Judgment and Rau's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 94) DE 112 . If no further request to maintain the document under seal is made by 1/31/19 then the Court will have the seal lifted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 1/22/19. (nal)
|
|
Filing
43
OPINION AND ORDER The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the Motion to Strike Certain of Defendant Lillian Marlene Raus Affirmative Defenses, DE 34 . The Court STRIKES 32 Affirmative Defense 3 and the defenses of waiver and estoppel from Aff irmative Defense 4 from Defendant Lillian Marlene Raus Answer. The defense of reformation contained in Affirmative Defense 4 is not stricken. The Court ORDERS Defendant Lillian Marlene Raus Affirmative Defenses Nos. 1 and 5 WITHDRAWN. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 3/10/17. (kjp) Modified on 3/10/2017 (kjp).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
