Munster Steel Co Inc v. Crane 1 Services Inc
Plaintiff: Munster Steel Co Inc
Defendant: Crane 1 Services Inc
Case Number: 2:2016cv00345
Filed: July 26, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Hammond Office
County: Lake
Presiding Judge: John E Martin
Presiding Judge: Rudy Lozano
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 226 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 207 MOTION to Compel Inspection Against Plaintiff. The Court ORDERS Munster to make its bridge cranes, gantry cranes and supporting structures available for a single inspection, during which Defendants Crane 1 Delaware and RNM may participate. The Court DENIES RNMs request for reimbursement of attorney fees incurred in making the instant motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 12/12/2019. (bas)
November 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 219 OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 189 MOTION to Quash Subpoena Issued to Kenneth Hessevick or Alternatively Modify the Subpoena to Protect Privileged Communications and MODIFYING the subpoena issued by Munster to Kenneth Hessevick in the manner described in Order and Opinion. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 11/21/2019. (lhc)
November 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 210 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 196 Motion for Reconsideration. The Court ORDERS that RNM need not produce documents in response to Munster's requests for production, #46, #52, and #54 until further order of the Court. Any renewed motion to compel addressing these requests must be filed by 11/22/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 11/07/2019. (jat) Modified on 11/8/2019 to update docket text to opinion and order(rmc).
October 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 192 OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery Responses and Depositions from Defendant RNM Holdings, Inc. 179 . The Court ORDERS RNM to produce documents in response to the requests for production by 11/8/2019, and produce witnesses for deposition regarding the asset purchase agreement and relationship between Crane 1 Delaware and Crane 1 Ohio. The Court ORDERS Munster to file, by 10/23/2019, an itemization of costs and fees incurred in making the motion, with RNM to respond by 11/6/2019, and Munster to file a reply, if any, by 11/13/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 10/9/2019. (jss)
September 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 184 OPINION AND ORDER The Court GRANTS the 175 Motion to Compel. The Court ORDERS Munster to either (1) produce the updated appendices in full and separately label each appendix, or (2) identify the Bates numbers that comprise each appendix, clearly in dicating which documents are contained in each appendix, by September 27, 2019. The Court ORDERS Crane 1 Delaware to file, by September 27, 2019, an itemization of costs and fees incurred in making the motion, with Munster to respond by October 11, 2019, and Crane 1 Delaware to file a reply, if any, by October 18, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 9/13/19. (kjp)
February 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 152 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 124 MOTION Crane 1 Services Motion to Strike Cincinnati Crane Affirmative Defenses. The Court STRIKES the Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, Twelfth, and Thirteenth Affirmative Defenses in Cincinnati Crane & Hoist LLC's Answer [DE 115]. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 2/4/19. (ksp)
July 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 91 OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS Dft's Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer to Pla's Complaint, Affirmative Defenses and Jury Demand 53 and Dft's FRCP Rule 14 Motion for Leave to File Third-Party Complaint Against Cincinnati Cr ane & Hoist, LLC 78 . The Court ORDERS Dft to file its Amended Answer, currently on the docket as an attachment to the instant Motion, by 8/7/2018, and REMINDS Dft of the need to provide summons and effect service on the third-party dft in accordanc e with FRCP Rule 4. The Court GRANTS, for relief different than requested, Pla's Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines 90 . Noting that the introduction of an additional party may result in further discovery, the Court SETS this matter for a tel ephonic status conference, to be initiated by the Court on 9/20/2018, at 10:00 a.m. (CST), to establish new deadlines for discovery, as outlined. The parties are ORDERED to file a proposed joint discovery plan by 9/14/2018. The Court DENIES as moot, with leave to re-file, the three discovery motions currently pending: Pla's Motion to Compel Answers to Certified Questions, to Compel Answers to Pla's Second Set of Interrogatories, and for Fees and Costs 69 ; Dft's Motion to Quash Subpoena Issued to Kenneth Hessevick or Alternatively Modify the Subpoena to Protect Privileged Communications 82 ; and Dft's Motion to Quash Subpoena Issued to Gregory Tonner 83 . Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 7/25/2018. (lhc)
March 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 63 OPINION AND ORDER: The Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Seal Documents 59 with leave to refile a renewed Motion to Seal and/or Redact that complies with the applicable legal standards. If no party files such a motion on or before 4/3/2018, the Agreement will be unsealed. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 3/26/2018. (jss)
January 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 48 OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the Opinion and Order, the 13 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; however Count V is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 1/30/2018. (jss)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Munster Steel Co Inc v. Crane 1 Services Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Munster Steel Co Inc
Represented By: Geoffrey A Bryce
Represented By: Tina M Paries PHV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Crane 1 Services Inc
Represented By: Adam J Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?