Mabry et al v. City of East Chicago et al
| Kendra Mabry, Angela Espinoza and Roberto Cabello, Jr. |
| City of East Chicago, Anthony Copeland, BP Products North America, Inc., EI DuPont de Nemours and Company, Atlantic Richfield Company, East Chicago Housing Authority and Tia Cauley |
| 2:2016cv00402 |
| September 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| Lake |
| John E Martin |
| Joseph S Van Bokkelen |
| Housing/Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
240
OPINION AND ORDER granting 238 Motion to Retax Costs. The court VACATES the 237 Notice of Costs Taxed and ORDERS that Plaintiffs are not obligated to pay Defendants' costs incurred in this litigation. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 2/28/24. (nal)
|
|
Filing
154
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 153 , DISMISSING Counts III, IV, V, and VII, and DISMISSING Counts VIII and IX insofar as they assert claims for the personal liability of Anthony Copeland and Tia Cauley for the Fair Housing Act disparate impact claims, the claim for violation of Section 1982, and the claim for violation of due process. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 11/4/2021. (lhc)
|
|
Filing
153
AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 129 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by East Chicago Housing Authority, Tia Cauley, City of East Chicago, Anthony Copeland. The Court hereby RECOMMENDS that the District Cou rt GRANT Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [DE 129] and dismiss Counts III, IV, V, and VII and dismiss counts VIIi and IX insofar as they assert claims for the personal liability of Anthony Copeland and Tia Cauley for the Fair Housing Act disparate impact claims, the claim for violation of Section 1982, and the claim for violation of due process. Objections to R&R within 14 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 10/20/2021. (jdb)
|
|
Filing
119
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court hereby GRANTS the Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Atlantic Richfield Company and BP Product North America Inc.'s Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint 106 as desc ribed above. The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint 91 : The Court GRANTS the motion insofar as it seeks to amend the Complaint to add claims of discrimination against the City o f East Chicago and East Chicago Housing Authority, and against East Chicago Mayor Anthony Copland and East Chicago Housing Authority Director Tia Cauley in their official and individual capacities, including claims for discriminatory intent and dispa rate impact in violation of the Fair Housing Act 42 U.S.C. § 3604(a), (b), violations of § 1982, and violations of the Equal Protection Clause and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court DENIES the motion to amend the Complaint as to all claims against Defendants BP Products North America, Inc., Atlantic Richfield Company, and E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and all claims under 42 U.S.C. § 3617. The Court ORDERS Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint co nsistent with this Opinion and the Opinions granting previous motions to dismiss by 4/21/2021. Defendants' answers are to be filed in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a). Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 3/24/2021. (bas)
|
|
Filing
83
OPINION AND ORDER The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part 53 Defendants East Chicago Housing Authority and Tia Cauley's Motion to Dismiss. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice (1) the Fair Housing Act claims for intentional discrimination and disparate impact, (2) the § 1982 claim, and (3) the Equal Protection Clause claim. The Court DISMISSES with prejudice the § 1983 claims against Cauley in her official capacity. The Due Process claim REMAINS PENDING as to ECHA and Cauley in her individual capacity. The Tenants have (28) twenty-eight days after the entry of this Opinion and Order within which to file a motion for leave to amend their complaint. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 2/11/20. (kjp)
|
|
Filing
77
OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the Opinion and Order, the motion of defendants BP Products North America Inc. and Atlantic Richfield Company to dismiss the Plaintiffs' complaint as to them 39 is GRANTED. Their request for jud icial notice 41 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion of defendant E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company to dismiss the Plaintiffs' complaint as to them 42 is GRANTED. Their request for judicial notice 43 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 9/27/2017. (jss)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
