Fifth Third Bank v. McMurtry
| Fifth Third Bank |
| McMurtry and Robert J McMurtry |
| 2:2016cv00503 |
| December 1, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| John E Martin |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the #5 notice of dismissal. (saj) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Fifth Third Bank (Kendall, Thomas) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Alexander N Loftus PHV for Robert J McMurtry. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 12/2/16. (mtr)
|
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Attorney Alexander Loftus to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Robert J. McMurtry ; (paid by check# 3238 Receipt #INN2013391). (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(jss) Modified on 12/2/2016 (jss). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Robert J McMurtry (Filing fee paid by check#3239 $ 400 - Receipt #INN2013392), from Lake County Circuit Court, Cause No. 45D11-1610-PL-0104, filed by Robert J McMurtry. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(jss) Modified on 12/2/2016 (jss). |
| Filing 2 STATE COURT COMPLAINT against Robert J McMurtry, filed by Fifth Third Bank.(jss) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
