Santos v. County of Lake, Indiana et al
| Adrian Santos, III |
| County of Lake, Indiana and John Buncich |
| 2:2017cv00273 |
| June 28, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| Lake |
| Rudy Lozano |
| Andrew P Rodovich |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 89 Joint MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by John Buncich. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 3/25/2021. (mrm)
|
|
Filing
77
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court DENIES Lake County's 36 Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and GRANTS in part and DENIES in part 40 the Sheriff Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint. The Court DISMISSES the claims against Oscar Martinez in his official capacity as Sheriff of Lake County, Indiana. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 6/1/2020. (bas)
|
|
Filing
65
OPINION AND ORDER The Motion to Strike Additions to Plaintiff's DepositionTestimony Improperly Made by Errata Sheet, DE 59 is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 10/30/18. (kjp)
|
|
Filing
37
OPINION AND ORDER: Because the second amended complaint supersedes the previous complaints, the pending motions to dismiss 16 & 18 are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 11/20/2017. (jss)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
