El Samad v Shoukry

El Samad v Shoukry

Plaintiff:	Ahmad El Samad
Defendant:	Ahmed F Shoukry
Case Number:	2:2017cv00365
Filed:	September 18, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office:	Hammond Office
County:	Lake
Presiding Judge:	John E Martin
Presiding Judge:	James T Moody
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 4, 2018	Filing 41 OPINION AND ORDER: Court GRANTS 14 Motion to Dismiss as to all remaining claims and DISMISSES the case. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 9/4/2018. (tc)
July 23, 2018	Filing 40 OPINION AND ORDER: The court GRANTS the motion to dismiss (DE # 14) inpart as to Counts I and II. Furthermore, the court GRANTS plaintiff until August 22, 2018 to move for leave to amend the complaint in order to (1) include the real parties in inte rest for all claims that remain in the amended complaint and (2) demonstrate that complete diversity exists for all parties. Because the question of subject matter jurisdiction remains, the court will not address any further arguments in the motion to dismiss or any other motions at this time. Accordingly, the court DENIES plaintiff's "motion for enjoinder" (DE # 27) with leave to refile once jurisdiction is resolved. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 7/23/18. (ksp)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 4, 2018

Filing 41 OPINION AND ORDER: Court GRANTS 14 Motion to Dismiss as to all remaining claims and DISMISSES the case. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 9/4/2018. (tc)

July 23, 2018

Filing 40 OPINION AND ORDER: The court GRANTS the motion to dismiss (DE # 14) inpart as to Counts I and II. Furthermore, the court GRANTS plaintiff until August 22, 2018 to move for leave to amend the complaint in order to (1) include the real parties in inte rest for all claims that remain in the amended complaint and (2) demonstrate that complete diversity exists for all parties. Because the question of subject matter jurisdiction remains, the court will not address any further arguments in the motion to dismiss or any other motions at this time. Accordingly, the court DENIES plaintiff's "motion for enjoinder" (DE # 27) with leave to refile once jurisdiction is resolved. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 7/23/18. (ksp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: El Samad v Shoukry
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ahmad El Samad
Represented By:	John H Davis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Ahmed F Shoukry
Represented By:	Andrew H Eres PHV
Represented By:	Kevin V Hunt PHV
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?