DeLuna v. Martinez et al
Plaintiff: Mark Anthony DeLuna
Defendant: Sheriff Oscar Martinez Jr, Former Sheriff John Buncich, Former Assistant Deputy Gore, Assistant Deputy Warden Nearly, Sergeant Phyliss Leto, Officer Mattingly and Kathy
Case Number: 2:2018cv00094
Filed: March 9, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Hammond Office
County: Lake
Presiding Judge: John E Martin
Presiding Judge: James T Moody
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 29 OPINION AND ORDER: This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for non-payment of the filing fee. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 9/4/18. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ksp)
May 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 OPINION AND ORDER re 5 Amended Complaint. The Court GRANTS Mark Anthony DeLuna leave to proceed against Officer Mattingly in his individual capacity for compensatory damages for proximately causing him to get scabies by not decontaminating inmate s entering the Lake County Jail in September 2017 in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment; GRANTS Mark Anthony DeLuna leave to proceed against Nurse Practitioner Kathy in her individual capacity for compensatory damages for being deliberately indiff erent to his need for medical treatment of scabies on October 28, 2017, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment; DISMISSES all other claims; DISMISSES Sheriff Oscar Martinez, Jr., Former Sheriff John Buncich, Former Assistant Deputy Gore; Sergeant P hyliss Leto, and Assistant Deputy Warden Nearly; DIRECTS the clerk and the United States Marshals Service to issue and serve process on Officer Mattingly and Nurse Practitioner Kathy at the Lake County Jail with a copy of this order and the amended c omplaint (ECF 5) as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d); and ORDERS, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), that Officer Mattinglyand Nurse Practitioner Kathy respond, as provided for in the Federal Rules ofCivil Procedure and N.D. Ind. L.R. 10-1 (b), only to the claims for which theplaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in this screening order. Party Sergeant Phyliss Leto, Sheriff Oscar Martinez Jr, Assistant Deputy Warden Nearly, Former Sheriff John Buncich ((Now Imprisoned)) and Former Assistant Deputy Gore ((Now Lieutenant)) terminated. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 5/24/18. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mlc)
March 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 OPINION AND ORDER: DISMISSES Oscar Martinez, Jr., John Buncich, Nearly, Gone, Leto, and Mattingly; DIRECTS the clerk to place this cause number on a blank Prisoner Complaint (INND Rev. 8/16) form and send it to Mark Anthony DeLuna with a copy of this order; GRANTS him until 4/12/2018, to file an amended complaint; and CAUTIONS him if he does not respond by the deadline, this case will be dismissed without further notice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A because the complaint does not state a claim. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 3/12/2018. (Copy mailed to pro se party w/forms)(lhc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DeLuna v. Martinez et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Anthony DeLuna
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sheriff Oscar Martinez Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Former Sheriff John Buncich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Former Assistant Deputy Gore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Assistant Deputy Warden Nearly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sergeant Phyliss Leto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Mattingly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kathy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?