Wenzel v. Reynolds et al
| Thomas A Wenzel |
| Sheriff David Reynolds, Castle and Burke |
| 2:2018cv00128 |
| April 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Hammond Office |
| Porter |
| John E Martin |
| Rudy Lozano |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS Thomas A. Wenzel leave to proceed against Officer Castle in his individual capacity for monetary damages on his claim that he was denied his religious book between February 9, 2018, and February 12, 2018; GRANTS leave to proceed against Chaplin Burke in his individual capacity for monetary damages on his claim that he was denied similar access to religious study materials as Christians while housed at the Porter County Jail; DISMISSES all other claims; DI SMISSES Sheriff David Reynolds; DIRECTS the Clerk and the USMS to issue and serve process on Officer Castle and Chaplin Burke at the Porter County Sheriff's Office with a copy of this Order and the Complaint 8 as required by 28:1915(d); and ORDERS, pursuant to 42:1997e(g)(2), that Officer Castle and Chaplin Burke respond, as provided for in the FRCP and N.D. Ind. L.R. 10-1(b), only to the claim for which the Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in this screening Order. Signed by Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann on 9/13/2018. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(lhc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
