Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Indiana Northern District Mulhern v. ADT Security Services, LLC et al

Mulhern v. ADT Security Services, LLC et al

Plaintiff:	Patrick J Mulhern
Defendant:	ADT Security Services, LLC, Protection One Alarm Monitoring, Inc. and Prime Security Services Topco Parent, L.P.
Case Number:	2:2018cv00229
Filed:	June 14, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office:	Hammond Office
County:	Lake
Presiding Judge:	John E Martin
Presiding Judge:	Rudy Lozano
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 25, 2019	Filing 32 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 30 Stipulation for Entry of a Consent Decree and Order. The parties are granted leave to (1) file a stipulated dismissal as of right pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), dismissing the entire ac tion and signed by all the parties' representatives; (2) file a renewed motion for entry of a consent decree addressing why a consent decree would be consistent with the law, would not cause harm to the legitimate interest of third parties, and is an appropriate commitment of the court's limited resources and attaching an Amended proposed Consent Decree that complies with Rule 65(d); (3) file a status report with the Court; or (4) otherwise proceed in another manner as deemed appropriate by the attorneys. The Parties are ORDERED to make their next filing in this matter on or before 12/31/2019. Signed by Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann on 11/25/2019. (jat)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 25, 2019

Filing 32 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 30 Stipulation for Entry of a Consent Decree and Order. The parties are granted leave to (1) file a stipulated dismissal as of right pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), dismissing the entire ac tion and signed by all the parties' representatives; (2) file a renewed motion for entry of a consent decree addressing why a consent decree would be consistent with the law, would not cause harm to the legitimate interest of third parties, and is an appropriate commitment of the court's limited resources and attaching an Amended proposed Consent Decree that complies with Rule 65(d); (3) file a status report with the Court; or (4) otherwise proceed in another manner as deemed appropriate by the attorneys. The Parties are ORDERED to make their next filing in this matter on or before 12/31/2019. Signed by Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann on 11/25/2019. (jat)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mulhern v. ADT Security Services, LLC et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patrick J Mulhern
Represented By:	Arthur C Johnson, II
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: ADT Security Services, LLC
Represented By:	John A Drake
Represented By:	Todd J Kaiser
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Protection One Alarm Monitoring, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Prime Security Services Topco Parent, L.P.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?