Rattler v. Commissioner of Social Security
John R Rattler, Jr |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA (Court Use Only) |
2:2018cv00487 |
December 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Michael G Gotsch |
Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. NOTE: The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. (cc: USM) (sct) |
Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING the Plaintiff leave to proceed in Forma Pauperis (CF No. #3 ).WAIVES payment of the filing fee. DIRECTS, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d), the United States Marshals Service to effect service of process on the Defendant. Signed by Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann on 1/29/2019. (cc: USMS) (sct) |
Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr added. (New Case) (IFP Motion Pending) (sct) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff John R Rattler, Jr. (Schultz, Barry) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Barry A Schultz on behalf of John R Rattler, Jr (Schultz, Barry) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by John R Rattler, Jr. (Attachments: #1 AC decision, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 USM forms)(Schultz, Barry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.