Firnhaber v. Fas Pak Inc
David Karl Firnhaber |
Fas Pak Inc |
2:2019cv00056 |
February 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Joshua P Kolar |
James T Moody |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 117 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE by Fas Pak Inc re #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Phillips, Mark) |
Filing 9 BRIEF in Support of #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Fas Pak Inc. (Phillips, Mark) |
Filing 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Fas Pak Inc. (Phillips, Mark) |
***Deadlines/Hearings terminated. Waiver of Service Deadline terminated. Waiver and appearance filed on behalf of defendant. (tlr) |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 3/4/2019. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (tc) |
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Fas Pak Inc. Fas Pak Inc waiver sent on 2/13/2019, answer due 4/15/2019. (Phillips, Mark) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark L Phillips on behalf of Fas Pak Inc (Phillips, Mark) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons sent to Fas-Pak, Inc. (Copy mailed to pro se party and defendant). Waiver of Service due by 3/15/2019. (Attachments: #1 Order, #2 Complaint) (nal) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Court DEFERS payment of the filing fee, ORDERS the plaintiff to pay the $350.00 filing fee from the proceeds of any recovery received in this case and DIRECTS, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d), the clerk and the United States Marshals Service to issue and serve process at Fas-Pak, Inc., c/o Registered Agent Gregory J. Ake, 411 Fairfield Ave., Michigan City, IN 46360. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 2/13/19. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nal) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff David Karl Firnhaber. (rmf) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with 1 copies of summons forms and 0 copies of USM-285 forms against Fas Pak Inc, filed by David Karl Firnhaber. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Envelope) (rmf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Firnhaber v. Fas Pak Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: David Karl Firnhaber | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Fas Pak Inc | |
Represented By: | Mark L Phillips |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.