Nick v.The Home Depot Southlake Store #2001 etal
| Henry Nick |
| Home Depot, The Home Depot Southlake Store #2001 and Home Depot USA Inc |
| 2:2019cv00218 |
| June 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| John E Martin |
| James T Moody |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
PROTECTIVE ORDER granting #14 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Home Depot USA Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 8/6/19. (kjp)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION for Protective Order Motion For Agreed Confidentiality And Protective Order by Defendant Home Depot USA Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Confidentiality Stipulation And Protective Order)(Sichtermann, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 13
MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties.. (smb)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER & NOTICE OF HEARING: Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 9/19/2019 10:30 AM Central in US District Court - Hammond before Magistrate Judge John E Martin. Proposed joint discovery plan in accordance with FRCP 26(f) due by 9/13/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 8/2/2019. (smb)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 8/2/2019. (smb)
|
|
Filing 10
STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED (Docket Sheet). State Court Case No. 45D05-1905-CT-000522. (nal)
|
|
Filing 9
Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Home Depot Southlake Store #2001 identifying Corporate Parent Home Depot USA Inc The for The Home Depot Southlake Store #2001.. (Sichtermann, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 8
ANSWER to Complaint by The Home Depot Southlake Store #2001.(Sichtermann, Jonathan) Modified docket text to correct name of filer on 7/8/2019 (ksc).
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Sichtermann on behalf of The Home Depot Southlake Store #2001 (Sichtermann, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 6
ANSWER to Complaint by Home Depot USA Inc.(Sichtermann, Jonathan)
|
|
Senior Judge James T Moody and Magistrate Judge John E Martin added. NEW CASE (kjp)
|
|
Filing 4
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Home Depot identifying Corporate Parent Home Depot Inc The for Home Depot.. (Sichtermann, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Sichtermann on behalf of Home Depot (Sichtermann, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Supplement #1 Notice of Removal,, Civil Cover Sheet by Defendant Home Depot. (Sichtermann, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-3923302.) from Circuit Court of Lake Superior Court 5, Cause No. 45D05-1905-CT-000522, filed by Home Depot. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiffs Summons to each defendant, #2 Exhibit Plaintiff's Complaint for Damages and Request for Trial by Jury, #3 Exhibit Plaintiff's Appearance, #4 Exhibit Green Cards filed by Plaintiff, #5 Exhibit Defendant's Appearance, #6 Exhibit Summons directed to HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., showing date of service (5.23.19.))(Sichtermann, Jonathan)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
