Williams v. Hamady et al
Davonte Williams |
Sgt. Hamady, Nicholas Kopack, Officer Kranz, Lake County Sheriff's Department, Officer Nicholas Kopack and Lake County Sheriff Department |
2:2019cv00233 |
June 28, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Joseph S Van Bokkelen |
Joshua P Kolar |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 TELEPHONIC RULE 16 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE held on 8/22/2019, before Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar. Pla appeared by atty Russell Brown. Dfts appeared by attys Casey McCloskey, Caleb Johnson, Alfredo Estrada, John Kopack. The Report filed as DE #22 is APPROVED and ADOPTED as follows: Initial Disclosures to be exchanged by 9/30/2019. All discovery to be completed by 4/30/2020. Plaintiff expert witness disclosures and reports to be delivered to the defendant by 1/31/2020. Defendant expert witness disclosures and reports to be delivered to the plaintiff by 3/31/2020. Rule 26(e) supplements due by 4/30/2020. The last date for any party to seek leave of court to join additional parties and to amend the pleadings is 10/31/2019. Parties anticipate the case should be ready for a 3 day jury trial by 7/29/2020. The parties have discussed mediation and plan to submit this matter to mediation before the end of discovery. Magistrate Consent forms ddl extended to 9/12/2019. All other dates/ddls to be set by presiding judge at a later time. The summary judgment deadline in FRCP 56 shall not apply. (Tape #FTR GOLD.) (tc) |
Filing 22 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Johnson, Caleb) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 19 MOTION to Participate Telephonically at Rule 16 Prelimiary Pretrial Conference by Defendant Officer Nicholas Kopack. (Johnson, Caleb) |
Filing 18 ANSWER to #5 STATE COURT Complaint by Officer Nicholas Kopack.(Johnson, Caleb) Modified on 7/30/2019 (jss). |
Filing 17 MOTION to Participate Telephonically at Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference by Defendant Officer Kranz. (Estrada, Alfredo) |
Filing 16 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. Magistrate Consent forms due by 8/22/2019. (tc) |
![]() |
Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint by Sgt. Hamady.(McCloskey, Casey) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint by Officer Kranz.(Estrada, Alfredo) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Davonte Williams (Brown, Russell) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Caleb S Johnson on behalf of Officer Nicholas Kopack (Johnson, Caleb) |
![]() |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Lake County Sheriff Department.(Kopack, John) |
Filing 8 STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED (docket sheet). State Court Case No. 45D01-1905-CT-000573. (nal) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Protective Order by Defendant Lake County Sheriff Department. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Agreed Protective Order)(Kopack, John) |
![]() |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Casey J McCloskey on behalf of Sgt. Hamady (McCloskey, Casey) |
Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen and Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar added. (NEW CASE) (ksp) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by John M Kopack on behalf of Lake County Sheriff's Department (Kopack, John) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Alfredo Estrada on behalf of Officer Kranz (Estrada, Alfredo) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-3937779.) from Lake Superior Court, Cause No. 45D01-1905-CT-000573, filed by Officer Kranz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Estrada, Alfredo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.