Bush v. Zenk et al
Edwon Bush |
Oscar Martinez, O'Connor and Michael Zenk |
2:2019cv00298 |
August 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Joshua P Kolar |
Theresa L Springmann |
Prison Conditions |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (Copy mailed to pro se party certified mail# 7018 1830 0001 3192 2163) (rmf) |
Filing 3 ORDER: The Court DISMISSES this case without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Theresa L. Springmann on 10/8/2019. (Copy mailed to pro se party certified mail# 7018 1830 0001 3192 2163) (rmf) |
Filing 2 ORDER DIRECTING the clerk to place this cause number on a blank Prisoner Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis form and send it to Edwon Bush; GRANTING Edwon Bush until 9/24/2019 to resolve his filing fee status; and CAUTIONS Edwon Bush that, if he does not respond by the deadline, this case will be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann on 8/22/2019. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(bas) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with 0 copies of summons forms and 0 copies of USM-285 forms against Oscar Martinez, O'Connor, and Michael Zenk, filed by Edwon Bush. Case opened per Opinion and Order [DE 3] in case no. 2:19-cv-278. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (shk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.