Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Wilkins Micawber LLC
Scottsdale Insurance Company |
Wilkins Micawber LLC |
2:2019cv00322 |
August 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
John E Martin |
Philip P Simon |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER : The Clerk is hereby directed to reassign the cases from Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen to Judge Philip P Simon for all further proceedings. This order does not change the assignment of the Magistrate Judge or any previously scheduled deadlines, hearings or trial dates. Signed by Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann on 10/7/2019. (jss) |
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. Wilkins Micawber LLC waiver sent on 9/6/2019, answer due 11/5/2019. (McKinzie, John) |
Filing 7 STATEMENT (Supplemental Jurisdictional). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Certified Business Entity Report)(Bennett, Kevin) |
Filing 6 ORDER Plaintiff is directed to file an amendment to its jurisdictional statement as outlined in order by September 25, 2019. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 9/10/19. (kjp) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by John Mark McKinzie on behalf of Scottsdale Insurance Company (McKinzie, John) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Scottsdale Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company for Scottsdale Insurance Company.. (Bennett, Kevin) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin T Bennett on behalf of Scottsdale Insurance Company (Bennett, Kevin) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Wilkins Micawber LLC. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (nal) |
Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen and Magistrate Judge John E Martin added. NEW CASE. (nal) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment against Wilkins Micawber LLC( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-3990498.), filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Scottsdale Policy, #2 Exhibit B: Micawber Insurance Application, #3 Exhibit C: IDEM Letter to Micawber, #4 Exhibit D: Micawber Letter to Scottsdale, #5 Exhibit E: Scottsdale Email to Micawber, #6 Exhibit F: SME Site Characterization Report, #7 Exhibit G: Scottsdale Letter to Micawber, #8 Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Proposed Summons)(McKinzie, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Wilkins Micawber LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Scottsdale Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | John Mark McKinzie |
Represented By: | Kevin T Bennett |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Wilkins Micawber LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.