Cox v. Citibank N.A.
Janay M. Cox |
Citibank N.A. |
2:2019cv00349 |
September 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Andrew P Rodovich |
Philip P Simon |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***Deadlines/Hearings terminated. Waiver of Service Deadline terminated. Waiver and appearances filed. (tlr) |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 10/15/2019. cc: Cox (tc) |
Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Citibank N.A.. Citibank N.A. waiver sent on 10/3/2019, answer due 12/2/2019. (Czanik, Kara) |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Citibank N.A. identifying Corporate Parent Citigroup Inc. for Citibank N.A... (Czanik, Kara) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Kara A Czanik on behalf of Citibank N.A. (Czanik, Kara) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Harry W Cappel on behalf of Citibank N.A. (Cappel, Harry) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan H Blaske on behalf of Citibank N.A. (Blaske, Nathan) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons sent to Citibank N.A.. Waiver of Service due by 11/4/2019. (Sent to Defendant) (Attachments: #1 Order, #2 Complaint) (rmf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/3/2019: #3 Exhibit) (rmf). |
Filing 3 ORDER: The Court GRANTS the plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 ,DEFERS payment of the filing fee, ORDERS the plaintiff to pay the $350.00 filing fee from the proceeds of any recovery received in this case, and DIRECTS the Clerk and the United States Marshals Service to issue and serve process at: Citibank N.A., P.O. Box 6191, Sioux Falls, SD 57117-6191. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 10/3/2019. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (rmf) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Janay M. Cox. (shk) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with 2 copies of summons forms and 0 copies of USM-285 forms and with Jury Demand against Citibank N.A., filed by Janay M. Cox. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons). (shk) (Additional attachment added on 9/18/2019: #2 Exhibit). (shk |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cox v. Citibank N.A. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Janay M. Cox | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Citibank N.A. | |
Represented By: | Harry W Cappel |
Represented By: | Kara A Czanik |
Represented By: | Nathan H Blaske |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.