Massengale v. Walgreen Company et al
| Sherry L Massengale |
| Walgreen Company and Thomas Mikrut |
| 2:2019cv00409 |
| October 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Joshua P Kolar |
| Theresa L Springmann |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER: Court GRANTS #12 Motion to Allow Counsel to Participate Telephonically in Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference. The Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference will proceed by teleconference. Court to initiate the call. If a different number than is listed on the docket should be used to reach counsel directly, please contact Judge Kolar's case manager at teresa_castillo@innd.uscourts.gov at least 24 hours in advance of hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 12/26/2019. (JPK)
|
|
Filing 12
Consent MOTION Leave to Appear Telephonically at Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference by Defendants Thomas Mikrut, Walgreen Company. (Borowski, Craig)
|
|
Filing 11
ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Thomas Mikrut, Walgreen Company.(Borowski, Craig)
|
|
Filing 10
MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. Magistrate Consent forms due by 1/9/2020. (tc)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 1/9/2020 09:15 AM in US District Court - Hammond before Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar. A proposed Discovery Plan under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) to be filed no later than five (5) business days prior to the pretrial conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 12/11/2019. (tc)
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 11/21/2019. (tc)
|
|
Filing 7
AGREED NOTICE to extend time to file answer filed by Thomas Mikrut, Walgreen Company ; answer due by December 19, 2019. (Borowski, Craig)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Craig M Borowski on behalf of All Defendants (Borowski, Craig)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued as to Thomas Mikrut, Walgreen Company. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (ksp)
|
|
Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann and Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar added. (NEW CASE) (ksp)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Ryan Andrew Deutmeyer on behalf of Sherry L Massengale (Austgen, David) Modified on 10/29/2019 to correct name of attorney in docket entry (ksp).
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey K. Williams on behalf of Sherry L. Massengale (Austgen, David) Modified on 10/29/2019 to correct name of attorney in docket entry (ksp).
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by David M Austgen on behalf of Sherry L Massengale (Austgen, David)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-4048674.), filed by Sherry L Massengale. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons)(Austgen, David)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
