Orange v. United States Steel Corporation
| Rovelle Quenton Orange |
| United States Steel Corporation |
| 2:2019cv00452 |
| November 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Joshua P Kolar |
| James T Moody |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Austgen, Terence)
|
|
Filing 10
MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. (Copy mailed to pro se party). Magistrate Consent forms due by 2/3/2020. (tc)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 1/30/2020 09:30 AM in US District Court - Hammond before Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar. A proposed Discovery Plan under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) to be filed no later than five (5) business days prior to the pretrial conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 1/13/2020. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(tc)
|
|
Filing 8
ANSWER to Complaint by United States Steel Corporation.(Torbic, Rodney)
|
|
Filing 7
Corporate Disclosure Statement by United States Steel Corporation. (Torbic, Rodney)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Rodney M Torbic on behalf of United States Steel Corporation (Torbic, Rodney)
|
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 1/2/2020. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (tc)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth M Bezak on behalf of United States Steel Corporation (Bezak, Elizabeth)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Terence M Austgen on behalf of United States Steel Corporation (Austgen, Terence)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to United States Steel Corporation. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (nal)
|
|
Filing 1
PRO SE COMPLAINT against United States Steel Corporation (Filing fee $400.00, Receipt #2019607) filed by Rovelle Quenton Orange. (nal)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Orange v. United States Steel Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Steel Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth M Bezak |
| Represented By: | Rodney M Torbic |
| Represented By: | Terence M Austgen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rovelle Quenton Orange | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
