Alvarez v. Quanta Services, Inc.
| Francisco Alvarez |
| M.J. Electric LLC and Quanta Services, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv00453 |
| November 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| John E Martin |
| Philip P Simon |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ALIAS SUMMONS ISSUED as to Quanta Services, Inc. NOTE: The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (nal) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons filed by Francisco Alvarez. (Schoop, Devlin) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Quanta Services, Inc.. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (kjp) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons filed by Francisco Alvarez. (Schoop, Devlin) |
| No Summons received with complaint. (mrm) |
| Judge Philip P Simon and Magistrate Judge John E Martin added. (NEW CASE) (mrm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Quanta Services, Inc. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0755-4078872) filed by Francisco Alvarez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schoop, Devlin). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
