Wolfe v. Commissioner of Social Security
Jaclyn S. Wolfe |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA (Court Use Only) |
2:2019cv00461 |
December 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Damon R Leichty |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 2019824. (rmf) |
***Deficiency Deadline of 1/8/2020 terminated. (rmf) |
Filing 5 ORDER DENYING #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; GRANTING the Plaintiff until 1/8/2020 to pay the $400.00 filing fee; and CAUTIONING the Plaintiff if there is no response by the deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 12/4/2019. (bas) |
Judge Damon R Leichty added. NEW CASE, MOTION PENDING. (nal) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Meredith Marcus on behalf of Jaclyn S. Wolfe (Marcus, Meredith) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Frederick J Daley, Jr on behalf of Jaclyn S. Wolfe (Daley, Frederick) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jaclyn S. Wolfe. (Attachments: #1 USM-285 (Commissioner), #2 USM-285 (Attorney General), #3 USM-285 (U.S. Attorney))(Daley, Frederick) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Jaclyn S. Wolfe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Daley, Frederick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.