Gentry et al v. Hammond Police Dept. et al
| Minor #2, Minor #1 and Brandon Joseph Gentry |
| Hammond Police Dept. and Lake County Sheriff |
| 2:2019cv00482 |
| December 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| John E Martin |
| Philip P Simon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed as to Brandon Joseph Gentry #4 Clerks Judgment and #3 Order Dismissing Case. (rmf) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (Copy mailed to pro se party via Certified Mail, receipt # 7018 1830 0001 3190 5449) (jat) |
Filing 3
OPINION AND ORDER: The Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis #2 is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) (B)(i) for filing a frivolous suit barred by res judicata. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 12/19/2019. (Copy mailed to pro se party via Certified Mail, receipt # 7018 1830 0001 3190 5449) (jat)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Brandon Joseph Gentry. (shk) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Hammond Police Dept. and Lake County Sheriff, filed by Brandon Joseph Gentry. (Attachments: #1 USM Forms, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Clerks Judgment 2:19-cv-400) (shk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
