Nickson v. United States Steel Corporation
Eriek Z. Nickson |
United States Steel Corp. and United States Steel Corporation |
2:2019cv00492 |
December 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Joshua P Kolar |
Theresa L Springmann |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER: Court GRANTS #13 Joint Motion for Leave to Appear Telephonically for Preliminary Pretrial Conference. The Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 2/27/2020 at 10:45 AM will be held telephonically for ALL PARTIES. Court to initiate the call. If a different number than is listed on the docket should be used to reach counsel directly, please contact Judge Kolar's Case Manager at teresa_castillo@innd.uscourts.gov at least 24 hours prior to the conference. Approved by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 2/20/2020. Text entry order. (tc) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Appear by Telephone by Eriek Z. Nickson re #9 Order,, Set Hearings, (Bodensteiner, Ivan) Modified on 2/20/2020 to reflect document is a motion (tc). |
Filing 12 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Bodensteiner, Ivan) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by United States Steel Corporation.(Austgen, Terence) |
Filing 10 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. Magistrate Consent forms due by 3/6/2020. (tc) |
Filing 9 ORDER: Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 2/27/2020 10:45 AM in US District Court - Hammond before Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar. A proposed Discovery Plan under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) to be filed no later than five (5) business days prior to the pretrial conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 2/14/2020. (tc) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Per DE #7 Agreed Notice, United States Steel Corp answer due 2/21/2020. (nae) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eriek Z. Nickson. All Defendants. (Bodensteiner, Ivan) |
Filing 7 AGREED NOTICE to extend time to file answer filed by United States Steel Corp. ; answer due by 2/21/2020. (Austgen, Terence) |
Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 1/13/2020. (tc) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by United States Steel Corp.. (Austgen, Terence) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth M Bezak on behalf of United States Steel Corp. (Bezak, Elizabeth) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Terence M Austgen on behalf of United States Steel Corp. (Austgen, Terence) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to United States Steel Corp.. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (mlc) |
Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann and Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar added. (NEW CASE) (mlc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against United States Steel Corp.( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-4101051.), filed by Eriek Z. Nickson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Bodensteiner, Ivan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.