Metsch v. Porter County, Indiana et al
| Rita Metsch |
| Porter County, Officer Foreman, Officer Lippens, David Reynolds, Officer Cain, Porter County Indiana, Officer Perez and Officer Creed |
| 2:2020cv00203 |
| May 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Joshua P Kolar |
| James T Moody |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rita Metsch. David Reynolds served on 6/17/2020, answer due 8/5/2020. (Gladish, David) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rita Metsch. Porter County Indiana served on 6/17/2020, answer due 8/5/2020. (Gladish, David) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rita Metsch. Officer Perez served on 6/17/2020, answer due 8/5/2020. (Gladish, David) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rita Metsch. Officer Lippens served on 6/17/2020, answer due 8/5/2020. (Gladish, David) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rita Metsch. Officer Foreman served on 6/17/2020, answer due 8/5/2020. (Gladish, David) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rita Metsch. Officer Creed served on 6/17/2020, answer due 8/5/2020. (Gladish, David) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rita Metsch. Officer Cain served on 6/17/2020, answer due 8/5/2020. (Gladish, David) |
Filing 6
ORDER: The Court GRANTS #4 Motion for Initial Extension of Time to File Answer. The deadline for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is EXTENDED to 8/5/2020. The Court NOTES that a Notice of Automatic Initial Extension of Time pursuant to N.D. Ind. L.R. 6-1(b) should be filed and titled as a notice, not a motion. Approved by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 6/26/2020. Text entry order. (tc)
|
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 6/26/2020. (tc)
|
| Filing 4 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Defendants Officer Cain, Officer Creed, Officer Foreman, Officer Lippens, Officer Perez, Porter County Indiana, David Reynolds. (Witte, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel M Witte on behalf of All Defendants (Witte, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Officer Cain, Officer Creed, Officer Foreman, Officer Lippens, Officer Perez, Porter County Indiana, David Reynolds. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (nae) |
| **NEW CASE** Senior Judge James T Moody and Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar added. (nae) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Porter County( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-4232256.), filed by Rita Metsch. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Proposed Summons, #7 Proposed Summons, #8 Proposed Summons)(Gladish, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
