McGrath et al v. Dunecrest Condominium Association
| Jill McGrath, CM, Tim McGrath, Colin McGrath, Michael McGrath and Martin McGrath |
| Dunecrest Condominium Association |
| 2:2020cv00271 |
| July 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| John E Martin |
| Theresa L Springmann |
| Civil Rights: Accomodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case and open a new casewith these filings in the South Bend Division. New case number 3:20-cv-656. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 8/5/2020. (shk)
|
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons filed by Michael McGrath. (rmf) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Attorney Michael John McGrath to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs ; Receipt #2020893. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Admission)(shk) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/17/2020: #2 Envelope, #3 Envelope) (shk). (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/27/2020: #4 SCOTUS Certificate) (ace). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dunecrest Condominium Association (Filing fee $ 400.) Receipt #2020892, filed by CM, Michael McGrath, Martin McGrath, Tim McGrath, Jill McGrath, Colin McGrath. (Summons not received). (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope, #3 Envelope)(shk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
