Matthews v. Kelly et al
| Paul T Matthews, Sr. |
| Laura Howard, Laura Kelly, Kaylene Brin, Roger Davis and Stephanie Petrie |
| 2:2020cv00357 |
| October 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| John E Martin |
| Theresa L Springmann |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter J Agostino on behalf of Laura Howard, Laura Kelly (Agostino, Peter) |
| Filing 17 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (smb) |
Filing 16
ORDER & NOTICE OF HEARING: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 1/21/2021 09:30 AM Central before Magistrate Judge John E Martin. Parties' proposed joint discovery plan in accordance with FRCP 26(f) due by 1/15/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 11/24/2020. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(smb)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 11/24/2020. (cc: pro se party)(smb)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Roger Davis, Laura Howard, Laura Kelly, answers due 12/7/2020. (lhc) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE by Roger Davis, Laura Howard, Laura Kelly LR 6.1 Extension (Agostino, Peter) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter J Agostino on behalf of Roger Davis (Agostino, Peter) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter J Agostino on behalf of Laura Howard (Agostino, Peter) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter J Agostino on behalf of Laura Kelly (Agostino, Peter) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due 12/21/2020. (ksp) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER re #9 Agreed Notice to Extend Time to File Answer filed by Roger Davis, Kaylene Brin, Stephanie Petrie. The Court hereby GRANTS the request contained within the Notice of Initial Extension #9 , and ORDERS Defendants Kaylene Brin, Stephanie Petrie, and Roger Davis shall have through December 21, 2020, within which to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. The Court further REMINDS Moving Defendants of the need to comply with all applicable Local Rules. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 11/20/20. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ksp)
|
| Filing 9 AGREED NOTICE to extend time to file answer filed by Kaylene Brin, Roger Davis, Stephanie Petrie ; answer due by 12/21/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Kansas Business Entity Search)(Twohy, John) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by John P Twohy on behalf of Kaylene Brin, Roger Davis, Stephanie Petrie (Twohy, John) |
| Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed obo Stephanie Petrie c/o Sunflower Child Support, filed by Paul T Matthews, Sr. (shk) |
| Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed obo Gov. Laura Kelly State of Kansas, filed by Paul T Matthews, Sr. (shk) |
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed obo Laura Howard, filed by Paul T Matthews, Sr. (shk) |
| Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed obo Roger Davis c/o K.S. DCF. Laura Howard, filed by Paul T Matthews, Sr. (shk) |
| Filing 3 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed obo Sunflower Child Support c/o Kaylena Brin, filed by Paul T Matthews, Sr. (shk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
