Paciorek v. Moss
Kenneth Paciorek |
Sheila M Moss |
2:2020cv00400 |
November 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
John E Martin |
James T Moody |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (smb) |
Filing 9 ORDER & NOTICE OF HERAING: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 2/25/2021 10:30 AM Central before Magistrate Judge John E Martin. Parties proposed joint discovery plan in accordance with FRCP 26(f) due 2/19/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 1/6/2021. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(smb) |
Filing 8 ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 1/6/2020. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(smb) |
***Deadlines/Hearings terminated. Waiver of Service filed. (tlr) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Adrienne Pope on behalf of Sheila M Moss (Pope, Adrienne) |
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Sheila M Moss. Sheila M Moss waiver sent on 11/13/2020, answer due 1/12/2021. (Atwood, Jonathan) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan D Atwood on behalf of Sheila M Moss (Atwood, Jonathan) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons sent to Sheila A Moss. Waiver of Service due by 12/14/2020. (Attachments: #1 Civil Complaint, #2 Order) (shk) |
Filing 3 ORDER: The Court GRANTS the plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 ; DEFERS payment of the filing fee; ORDERS the plaintiff to pay the $350.00 filing fee from the proceeds of any recovery received in this case; and DIRECTS the Clerk to request Waiver of Service from (and if necessary the United States Marshals Service to serve process on) the defendant with a copy of this order and the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d). Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 11/13/2020. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(shk) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Plaintiff Kenneth Paciorek. (shk) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Sheila M Moss, filed by Kenneth Paciorek. ( #1 Proposed Summons, #2 USM Form) (shk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Paciorek v. Moss | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sheila M Moss | |
Represented By: | Jonathan D Atwood |
Represented By: | Adrienne Pope |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kenneth Paciorek | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.