Jack Gray Logistics Network, Inc. v Rick Craven
Plaintiff: JACK GRAY LOGISTICS NETWORK, INC.
Defendant: RICK CRAVEN
Case Number: 2:2021cv00001
Filed: January 5, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Joshua P Kolar
Referring Judge: Philip P Simon
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER: The Court, finding good cause shown and noting Plaintiff does not object, GRANTS #14 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint and to Continue Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference. Defendant Rick Craven's time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is EXTENDED to 4/6/2021. The Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 3/17/2021 is RESET to 4/15/2021 10:00 AM in US District Court - Hammond before Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar. Parties are instructed to dial 877-336-1280 and enter access code 3293676# when prompted to join the conference. Parties are reminded of their obligation to file a proposed Discovery Plan no later than five business days prior to the pretrial conference. Approved by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 3/3/2021. Text entry order. (tc)
March 2, 2021 Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and to Continue Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference - Unopposed by Defendant Rick Craven. (Drake, John)
March 2, 2021 Filing 13 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. (tc)
March 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 3/17/2021 09:45 AM in US District Court - Hammond before Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar. Parties are instructed to dial 877-336-1280 and enter access code 3293676# when prompted to join the conference. A proposed Discovery Plan under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) to be filed no later than five (5) business days prior to the pretrial conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 3/2/2021. (tc)
February 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: The Court, finding good cause shown and noting Plaintiff does not object, GRANTS #10 Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant Rick Craven's time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is EXTENDED to 3/9/2021. Approved by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 2/1/2021. Text entry order. (tc)
January 29, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #4 State Court Complaint - Agreed by Defendant Rick Craven. (Drake, John)
January 15, 2021 Filing 9 STATEMENT - Defendant's Supplemental Jurisdictional Statement. (Drake, John)
January 15, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Lauren K Kroeger on behalf of Jack Gray Logistics Network, Inc. (Kroeger, Lauren)
January 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 OPINION AND ORDER: The Court ORDERS Defendant Rick Craven to FILE, on or before 1/29/2021, a supplemental jurisdictional statement that properly alleges the citizenship of Defendant and Plaintiff Jack Gray Logistics Network, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 1/15/2021. (mrm)
January 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 1/7/2021. (tc)
January 6, 2021 Set Deadline per Agreed Notice #5 . Defendant Rick Craven answer due by 2/9/2021. (mrm)
January 6, 2021 Filing 5 AGREED NOTICE to extend time to file answer filed by Rick Craven ; answer due by February 9, 2021. (Drake, John)
January 6, 2021 Judge Philip P Simon and Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar added. NEW CASE> (jat)
January 5, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE by RICK CRAVEN Proof of Service and Proof of Filing of Notice of Removal in State Court (Drake, John)
January 5, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John A Drake on behalf of RICK CRAVEN (Drake, John)
January 5, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0755-4442157.) from Lake Superior Court, Cause No. 45D10-2012-PL-000847, filed by RICK CRAVEN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Action Documents, #2 Exhibit B - Declaration of Richard Craven, #3 Exhibit C - State Court Notice of Filing, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Drake, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jack Gray Logistics Network, Inc. v Rick Craven
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RICK CRAVEN
Represented By: John A Drake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JACK GRAY LOGISTICS NETWORK, INC.
Represented By: Lauren K Kroeger
Represented By: Larry G Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?