Riffett v. Arcelormittal Indiana Harbor
Plaintiff: James Riffett
Defendant: Cleveland-Cliffs Steel LLC and Arcelormittal Indiana Harbor n/k/a and/or a/k/a and/or doing business as Cleveland-Cliffs Inc
Case Number: 2:2021cv00042
Filed: January 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: John E Martin
Referring Judge: Philip P Simon
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2021 Filing 8 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties.. (smb)
March 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER & NOTICE OF HEARING: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 4/8/2021 12:30 PM Central before Magistrate Judge John E Martin. Parties' proposed joint discovery plan in accordance with FRCP 26(f) due by 4/2/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 3/2/2021. (smb)
March 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 3/2/2021. (smb)
February 4, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew S Ver Steeg on behalf of Arcelormittal Indiana Harbor (Ver Steeg, Matthew)
January 28, 2021 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Arcelormittal Indiana Harbor identifying Corporate Parent Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. for Arcelormittal Indiana Harbor.. (Albright, Andrew)
January 28, 2021 Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by Cleveland-Cliffs Steel LLC, improperly sued as by Arcelormittal Indiana Harbor.(Albright, Andrew)
January 28, 2021 Judge Philip P Simon and Magistrate Judge John E Martin added. *NEW CASE* (lhc)
January 27, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0755-4465965.) from Lake County, Indiana Superior Court, Cause No. 45D02-2012-CT-001253, filed by Cleveland-Cliffs Steel LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Court File, #3 Exhibit B- Affidavit of Paul M. Liebenson)(Albright, Andrew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Riffett v. Arcelormittal Indiana Harbor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Riffett
Represented By: Brock P Alvarado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cleveland-Cliffs Steel LLC
Represented By: Andrew J Albright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arcelormittal Indiana Harbor n/k/a and/or a/k/a and/or doing business as Cleveland-Cliffs Inc
Represented By: Andrew J Albright
Represented By: Matthew S Ver Steeg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?