Garritano v. CSX Transportation Inc et al
Jeffery Garritano |
Lyft, Inc and CSX Transportation Inc |
2:2021cv00058 |
February 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
John E Martin |
Theresa L Springmann |
Federal Employer's Liability |
45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Lyft, Inc identifying Corporate Parent Lyft, Inc for Lyft, Inc.. (Healy, Patrick) |
Filing 16 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Lyft, Inc.(Healy, Patrick) |
Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by CSX Transportation Inc.(Dimmich, Sarah) |
Filing 14 ***FILED IN WRONG CASE, SEE 2:21cv58 FOR CORRECT ENTRY*** MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties.. (smb) Modified on 3/19/2021 (jld). |
Filing 13 ORDER & NOTICE OF HEARING: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 4/29/2021 12:00 PM Central before Magistrate Judge John E Martin. Proposed joint discovery plan in accordance with FRCP 26(f) due by 4/23/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 3/18/2021. (smb) |
Filing 12 ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 3/18/2021. (smb) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer reset for Lyft Inc to 4/12/21 per #11 Agreed Notice. (jld) |
Filing 11 AGREED NOTICE to extend time to file answer filed by Lyft, Inc ; answer due by 04/12/2021. (Healy, Patrick) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Patrick B Healy on behalf of Lyft, Inc (Healy, Patrick) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Per DE #9 CSX Transportation Inc answer due April, 8 2021. (nae) |
Filing 9 AGREED NOTICE to extend time to file answer filed by CSX Transportation Inc ; answer due by April 8, 2021. (Dimmich, Sarah) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jeffery Garritano. Lyft, Inc served on 2/22/2021, answer due 3/15/2021. (Brugess, George) |
Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Lyft, Inc. on 2/22/2021, filed by Jeffery Garritano. (Brugess, George) |
Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on CSX Transportation, Inc. on 2/18/21, filed by Jeffery Garritano. (Brugess, George) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CSX Transportation Inc identifying Corporate Parent CSX Corporation for CSX Transportation Inc.. (Binger, Lauren) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Lauren A Binger on behalf of CSX Transportation Inc (Binger, Lauren) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah N Dimmich on behalf of CSX Transportation Inc (Dimmich, Sarah) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to CSX Transportation Inc, Lyft, Inc. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (bas) |
Judge Theresa L Springmann and Magistrate Judge John E Martin added. (NEW CASE) (bas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against CSX Transportation Inc, Lyft, Inc( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0755-4485562.), filed by Jeffery Garritano. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Summons to CSX, #3 Proposed Summons Summons to Lyft)(Brugess, George) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.