Bowes-Northern v. Scott et al
Shedrick Bowes-Northern |
Sydney Scott, Cheryl Spencer and Stephen Smith |
2:2021cv00088 |
March 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Joshua P Kolar |
Philip P Simon |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER: Plaintiff Shedrick Bowes-Northern is ADVISED that his emails to the court, its chambers, or its staff, sent in the past or in the future, will be DISREGARDED as an inappropriate attempt to communicate with the court. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 4/19/2021. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mrm) |
Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed as to #3 Opinion and Order and #4 Clerks Judgment. (bas) |
Filing 4 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (Copy mailed to pro se party by certified mail 7020 0640 0000 2334 8986) (bas) |
Filing 3 OPINION AND ORDER: Mr. Bowes-Northern's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This case is now closed. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 3/11/2021. (Copy mailed to pro se party by certified mail 7020 0640 0000 2334 8986)(bas) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Shedrick Bowes-Northern. (rmf) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Sydney Scott, Stephen Smith, Cheryl Spencer, filed by Shedrick Bowes-Northern. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 USM Forms)(rmf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.