Pratt Logistics, LLC v. United Transport Inc et al
| Pratt Logistics, LLC |
| C & E Transport, Inc., Charlotte F. Mendez, Ernest A. Fields and United Transport Inc |
| 2:2021cv00148 |
| April 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Andrew P Rodovich |
| Philip P Simon |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 26
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email Correspondence Among Counsel)(Wendt, T)
|
|
Filing 25
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Twohy, John)
|
|
Filing 24
MEMORANDUM in Support of #23 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by United Transport Inc. (Twohy, John)
|
|
Filing 23
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant United Transport Inc. (Twohy, John)
|
|
Filing 22
MEMORANDUM in Support of #21 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by C & E Transport, Inc.. (Halstead, John)
|
|
Filing 21
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant C & E Transport, Inc.. (Halstead, John)
|
|
Filing 20
ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Affirmative Defenses, Jury Demand by C & E Transport, Inc., Ernest A. Fields, Charlotte F. Mendez.(Halstead, John)
|
|
Filing 19
MINUTE ORDER: The Court STRIKES #17 Answer and Motion to Dismiss. Pursuant to N.D. Ind. L.R. 7-1(a), motions must be filed separately. Defendants to file an answer and/or other responsive pleading that complies with N.D. Ind. L.R. 7-1(a) by 6/25/2021. By Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 6/22/2021. Text entry only. (tc)
|
|
Filing 18
MEMORANDUM in Support of #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Initial Responsive Pleading Motion to Dismiss filed by C & E Transport, Inc.. (Halstead, John)
|
|
Filing 17
STRICKEN RE 19 MINUTE ORDER: ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Affirmative Defenses, Jury Demand and Motion to Dismiss by C & E Transport, Inc., Ernest A. Fields, Charlotte F. Mendez.(Halstead, John) Modified on 6/22/2021 (tc).
|
|
Filing 16
MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. (tc)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 7/2/2021 10:30 AM in US District Court - Hammond before Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich. Parties are instructed to dial 877-336-1274 and enter access code 4620540# when prompted to join the conference. A proposed Discovery Plan under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) to be filed no later than five (5) business days prior to the pretrial conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 6/17/2021. (tc)
|
|
Filing 14
Corporate Disclosure Statement by C & E Transport, Inc.. (Halstead, John)
|
|
Reset Answer Deadlines: Answer for Charlotte F. Mendez, Ernest A. Fields, and C & E Transport, Inc. due 6/22/2021 pursuant to DE #7 . Answer for United Transport Inc due 6/24/2021 pursuant to DE #12 . (kms)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Appearance by Kyle G Grothoff on behalf of United Transport Inc (Grothoff, Kyle)
|
|
Filing 12
AGREED NOTICE to extend time to file answer filed by United Transport Inc ; answer due by June 24, 2021. (Twohy, John)
|
|
Filing 11
Corporate Disclosure Statement by United Transport Inc. (Twohy, John)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance by John P Twohy on behalf of United Transport Inc (Twohy, John)
|
|
Filing 9
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pratt Logistics, LLC. All Defendants. (Wendt, T)
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 5/17/2021. (tc)
|
|
Filing 7
Local Rule 6.1 Notice of Initial Enlargement of Time to Respond to Complaint or Initial Responsive Pleading by Defendants C & E Transport, Inc., Ernest A. Fields, Charlotte F. Mendez. (Halstead, John) Modified on 5/17/2021 to reflect document is not a motion (tc).
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by John H Halstead on behalf of C & E Transport, Inc., Ernest A. Fields, Charlotte F. Mendez (Halstead, John)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued as to C & E Transport, Inc., Ernest A. Fields, Charlotte F. Mendez, United Transport Inc. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (rmc)
|
|
Judge Philip P Simon and Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich added. (NEW CASE) (rmc)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Cory L Turner on behalf of Pratt Logistics, LLC (Turner, Cory)
|
|
Filing 3
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Pratt Logistics, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Pratt Industries, Inc. for Pratt Logistics, LLC.. (Wendt, T)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by T Joseph Wendt on behalf of Pratt Logistics, LLC (Wendt, T)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0755-4557364.), filed by Pratt Logistics, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons United Transport, #2 Proposed Summons Mendez, #3 Proposed Summons Fields, #4 Proposed Summons C&E Transport, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wendt, T)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
